Evidence available on 21 September 2026
Two primary captures dated 21 September use Prompt Lispro Fin. The .net about page describes analysis and decision support, while the .com homepage presents account funding and AI-assisted trading. Their statements are not independently verified capabilities, and common ownership was not established. A description from one domain cannot resolve the other domain's obligations merely because the displayed name matches.
Separate an analytical suggestion from an executable instruction
For a measured assessment, the boundary between suggestion and instruction must be explicit. Ask what information appears before a decision, what the user must approve and which party can act after approval. A screenshot showing a recommendation would not establish that an order was placed, accepted or completed. Conversely, a transaction record without the preceding decision cannot explain what authority was granted. These are distinct evidence requirements.
Evidence needed for a measured assessment
The next useful material would be a single offer's governing terms and an attributable account of that sequence. Only then would it make sense to choose a functional test. We have not submitted an order, compared execution prices or authenticated a provider for either candidate. This entry therefore records an unresolved service boundary and unknown status, with no financial result or tested automation attributed to Prompt Lispro Fin.